'Gruesome' War Bets Fuel Calls For Crackdown On Prediction Markets

15 March 2026
ShareSave


Natalie ShermanBusiness reporter


Stew, a 35-year-old from Montana, has actually delighted in meddling sports wagering considering that he downloaded the Kalshi app about 18 months ago.


But just a couple of weeks ago, after finding reports of raised pizza shipments around the Pentagon throughout some late-night scrolling, he made a various type of bet - betting $10 (₤ 7.50) on the chances that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would be "out" by 1 March.


It was a trade that tested the limitations of the sort of bets Americans are allowed to make.


So-called predictions markets - managed by firms such as Kalshi - have actually taken off in appeal over the last year, hosting more than $44bn in trades.


They are quickly changing the wagering landscape in the US, where sports betting was largely unlawful up until 2018 and gambling on elections had been off-limits till 2024.


While much of the activity on the platforms revolves around sporting matches, users can speculate on any variety of questions, including local elections, whether the US reserve bank will cut rate of interest and the year of Jesus Christ's return.


The apps caught fire during the 2024 US presidential project, after a legal triumph cleared the method for them to accept election bets and they revealed the odds tilting towards Donald Trump.


But it is more grisly wagers tied to military action involving Iran, Venezuela and Israel that have actually drawn attention recently.


In theory, such bets contravene of US financial rules, which bar trading on contracts involving war, terrorism, assassination, gaming or other prohibited activities.


But that hasn't stopped firms from taking in countless trades.


Critics have seized on the activity, calling for a crackdown on the apps, which they say are facilitating unseemly - and possibly illegal - war profiteering, producing national security risks and enabling chances for insider trading and corruption.


"You have now opened up gambling basically on almost anything and it has actually developed into this extremely, very gruesome kind of thing on the death of a president," stated Craig Holman, federal government affairs lobbyist at the Public Citizen advocacy group, which recently submitted a problem this week over the bets.


Polymarket alone has hosted what Bloomberg approximated as more than $500m in bets connected to the Iran war, at one point using a chance to play the odds on the chance of nuclear detonation.


The business, which is headquartered in New York however runs on a minimal basis in the US, eventually got rid of that market after it drew analysis on social media however users can still send bets on questions like when US forces will enter Iran. It did not respond to the BBC's ask for remark.


Kalshi likewise ended up cancelling the Khamenei market, which had drawn $54m in trades, noting that US-regulated entities were disallowed from "having a market straight choosing somebody's death".


The company, which did not react to an ask for remark for this short article, has said the war bets were taking place on unregulated exchanges outside the US.


Concerns about the war bets have clashed with a bigger battle over how prediction market firms need to be managed.


Unlike traditional video gaming firms, in which the chances are set by the company, prediction market business operate more like a stock exchange, enabling users to bet versus each other on the result of future events using "occasion agreements".


That design has actually enabled nationwide financial regulators at the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to claim oversight.


But critics say they are sports betting and betting operations attempting to dress up as financial exchanges in a bid to prevent more stringent guidelines and taxes dealt with by conventional gaming companies, which are regulated by the states.


Disagreement over who must be policing the apps has actually sparked dozens of legal battles throughout the US, as states begin to assert their right to control the business like other gaming firms, rather than leave oversight approximately the CFTC.


Even some Republicans have actually voiced concerns, as traditional video gaming firms have actually also stepped up their lobbying, employing a savvy previous Trump official, Mick Mulvaney, to plead their case in Washington.


"Nobody is saying that gaming should not be enabled," states Ben Schiffrin, director of securities policy at Better Markets, which promotes for monetary reforms. "What the states are stating and other advocates are saying is things that are gambling must be controlled as gambling."


Suspiciously timed bets related to military operations including Israel, Venezuela and Iran have included fodder to those calls.


In recent weeks, Democrats have presented legislation to bar federal officials from trading event agreements, indicating occurrences such as when a bettor new to Polymarket made nearly half a million dollars on the capture of Venezuela's president right before it was formally announced.


They have actually also issued notifies to customers about the dangers of expert trading and written to the administration prompting it to more clearly impose the guidelines versus wagering on war.


But the chances of a crackdown stay long.


Though the Biden administration had actually taken a hard line on the sector, proposing to ban sports and politics-related event agreements, that regulative drive stalled after a court defeat and the 2024 election of Donald Trump, who came to power promising a lighter hand.


Last month, the CFTC stated it would withdraw the proposed restriction on sports and election associated contracts.


It has actually likewise taken the side of prediction market firms in the legal battles they are facing in the states, which Michael Selig, of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, condemned in a recent opinion piece as "overzealous".


He argued that event contracts served "legitimate financial functions", enabling services to hedge against threats set off by occasions.


"It's clear that Americans like the product and wish to get involved," he stated, while likewise emphasising that platforms should still follow rules.


As the pressure mounts, Polymarket has actually announced actions to more officially police suspicious activity, while Kalshi, which advertises its status as a "regulated exchange", has ended up being more singing about what it is doing to combat insider trading.


It just recently revealed penalties in two cases of insider trading and disclosed that it had opened up 200 examinations over the in 2015.


The business also eventually cancelled the $54m market around Khamenei's ouster.


In a series of statements explaining the decision, the firm stated it did not "list markets straight tied to death", keeping in mind that its terms had consisted of that carve-out.


It assured to make the terms more clear from the get-go, stating it had "learned a lot" from the incident.


But in a sign of growing discomforts, the choice still triggered outrage amongst users, consisting of Stew, who said the firm had at first "buried" those guidelines and its description seemed disingenuous, considered that there were "only a handful of reasonable techniques" for Khamenei to go.


Stew, who got a refund, said he wasn't sure guideline was the response, but he was supportive to the concept that the debate seemed to be stumbling around semantics.


"They call it contract trading, which I think technically speaking, that's what it is. But if we're all being honest here, it's still wagering," he stated.


US economy


Donald Trump


Gambling