<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://thornsin.wiki/mediawiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Katrin90N8333</id>
	<title>ThornSin Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://thornsin.wiki/mediawiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Katrin90N8333"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://thornsin.wiki/wiki/Special:Contributions/Katrin90N8333"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T04:32:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://thornsin.wiki/mediawiki/index.php?title=Ohio_Sports_Betting_Tax_Cut_Bill_Introduced_As_Other_States_Consider_Increases&amp;diff=879</id>
		<title>Ohio Sports Betting Tax Cut Bill Introduced As Other States Consider Increases</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://thornsin.wiki/mediawiki/index.php?title=Ohio_Sports_Betting_Tax_Cut_Bill_Introduced_As_Other_States_Consider_Increases&amp;diff=879"/>
		<updated>2026-04-12T03:17:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katrin90N8333: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ohio approved a 2023 boost on its sports wagering tax. At least one lawmaker wishes to return it to its original rate.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;State Sen. Niraj Antani, the lead sponsor of the 2021 legislation that legalized Ohio sports wagering, presented a costs earlier today that would cut the tax rate from 20% of operator gross [https://www.garagesale.es/author/kandicegowr/ video gaming] income to 10%. Filed in his final days before leaving workplace, Antani composed in [https...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ohio approved a 2023 boost on its sports wagering tax. At least one lawmaker wishes to return it to its original rate.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;State Sen. Niraj Antani, the lead sponsor of the 2021 legislation that legalized Ohio sports wagering, presented a costs earlier today that would cut the tax rate from 20% of operator gross [https://www.garagesale.es/author/kandicegowr/ video gaming] income to 10%. Filed in his final days before leaving workplace, Antani composed in [https://diakov.net/user/MaxT9406412/ testament] supporting the [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/guyz789281/ tax decrease] that the existing rate makes it &amp;quot;significantly hard&amp;quot; for many smaller sized operators to be &amp;quot;financially practical.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;10 percent was a reasonable tax rate that put us in the middle of the pack,&amp;quot; Antani wrote in a letter to the state Senate&#039;s finance [https://kissnara.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&amp;amp;wr_id=311 committee]. &amp;quot;While I &#039;d enjoy for us to be at the 6.75% rate to tie the most affordable in the country, returning to 10% is sensible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://www.ebersbach.org/index.php?title=User:MarshaAfford Ohio sports] betting&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ohio&#039;s 2021 sports wagering legalization expense included one of the most [https://thestarsareright.org/index.php/User:PatMather699521 extensive licensing] caps in the country. More than two-dozen operators expressed interest in the market, the nation&#039;s seventh-largest by population.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As part of the state&#039;s latest budget plan, Gov. [https://www.etymologiewebsite.nl/wiki/Gebruiker:MelvaSanor2849 Mike DeWine] pushed to double the rate. The 10% rate was near the median average; the 20% puts Ohio at the sixth-highest mark of the 39 states that have approved legal sports betting.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The 10% tax rate was also a  that encouraged operators to get in the market said John Pappas, state advocacy director for gaming market support system iDEA, in an email to Covers.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;These companies made significant financial investments, established market access agreements, and secured provider agreements based upon this rate, Pappas composed. The midstream increase to 20% disrupted their organization designs, creating more challenges for operators and requiring numerous to leave Ohio while [http://local315npmhu.com/wiki/index.php/The_Bet_9Ja_Promotional_Code_This_2026_Is_YOHAIG hindering] other books from [https://livestatus.de/index.php?title=The_Bet_Naija_Promo_Code_2026_Is_YOHAIG seeking] available licenses.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nineteen mobile [https://wiki.novaverseonline.com/index.php/User:Carl617179831544 sportsbooks accepted] bets in Ohio in August. Three of those - Betfred, Superbook, and [http://noktaestates.com/nba-finals-game-6-preview-props-prediction/ Betway -] have actually since left the state. Six of the [https://bfdi-wiki.com/index.php/User:LoisU487128 staying] 16 books have less than 1% market share apiece.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Larger books by manage such as DraftKings and FanDuel, which each have around one third of the Ohio market, will have the ability to endure the greater rate. But it hurts competition for the smaller books, Pappas said, [https://azena.co.nz/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&amp;amp;wr_id=4773073 harming] the Ohio sports wagering market in general.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Returning to the original 10% rate would bring back stability, making it possible for operators to flourish and provide worth to Ohio consumers, while promoting a healthy, competitive market that benefits the state in the long term,&amp;quot; he said.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ohio lawmakers are nearing completion of a lame-duck legislative session following the 2024 [https://www.ge.infn.it/wiki//gpu/index.php?title=User:FletcherODea895 elections]. The [https://pokeavalar.pl/wiki/index.php?title=User:OrenEnnis32 sports wagering] tax rate most likely will not be thought about till the brand-new legislature assembles next year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;National ramifications&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ohio&#039;s potential tax [http://mediawiki.copyrightflexibilities.eu/index.php?title=User:VanessaSpeckman decline] comes ahead of a crucial 2025 legal season for betting industry stakeholders in statehouses across the country.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Several recognized sports wagering states have actually thought about [https://www.ebersbach.org/index.php?title=The_Bet9ja_Promo_Code_This_2026_Is_YOHAIG tax increase] bills ahead of the 2025 session, which starts in January in a lot of states. Illinois, one of the [https://wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr/Discussion_utilisateur:Shantell44O nation&#039;s highest-grossing] sports betting markets, has currently passed legislation that develops a tiered tax structure, pressing high [http://wiki.rumpold.li/index.php?title=Benutzer:PaulaHolman320 earners] such as DraftKings and FanDuel to near some of the country&#039;s highest levels.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DraftKings introduced and rapidly rescinded a proposal to pass the tax on to gamblers in Illinois, New York, and Pennsylvania. Operators are still dealing with how to handle a prospective greater tax burden in the face of sagging development opportunities.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Missouri was the only state to authorize sports wagering in fiscal year 2024. Minnesota and [https://wiki.insidertoday.org/index.php/User:LemuelBatten80 Georgia] appear like leading contenders in 2025, but there appears to be little possibility for legalization in California and Texas, the country&#039;s two biggest states by population.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Louisana legislators won&#039;t increase sports wagering taxes on sportsbooks today however interest remains in the legislature; state Rep. Michael Johnson indicated today the proposed 51% rate in a [https://code.stephenscity.gov/index.php/User:LaureneMagee brand-new bill-] which would be the country&#039;s highest - is too low.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The restricted future development chances for sports wagering come as online casino [https://wiki.takp.info/wiki/User:BellX251261 legalization] has actually been even slower. Though several states are [https://www.epesuj.cz/wiki/index.php/U%C5%BEivatel:BrigidaFtn anticipated] to introduce online slot and table video game legalization measures in 2025, there is no certainty any such [http://topsite.otaku-attitude.net/index.php?a=stats&amp;amp;u=lettiebullard9 legislation passes].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;These games, which have substantially greater earnings margins than sportsbooks, are only legal in 7 states.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sportsbooks have actually increased their margins in the previous 2 years largely due to the expansion of single-game parlays. But without new state markets, and possible future tax increases, there is a decreased earnings ceiling for the largest operators - and a prospective existential threat for smaller sized business.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katrin90N8333</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>